When
I was in my second year at grammar school, aged twelve, I handed in a
composition (called now a piece of creative
writing…) called The
Fox. My English teacher - a magisterial, handsome figure of a man - returned it to me with a high mark. I treasured this, having learned very quickly the
high gold-standard currency of marks.
But
much more important, in the margin he’d written in his flowing hand ‘Good Syntax!’
So,
what was this thing I was good at? I had to go to the big dictionary – one of the two big
books in my little house. There I read:
syn·tax
- The
study of the rules whereby words or other elements of sentence structure
are combined to form grammatical sentences
- The
pattern of formation of sentences or phrases in a language
- A systematic, orderly arrangement of words
I was very pleased by this revelation. I
reckon that was the point where I actually decided to be a writer, even though I’d never
met a writer and had actually never met anyone (except my teachers) who wore a
white - not a blue - collar to work.
The rules of good syntax were only
peripherally taught at that school; I really learned the nature of syntax and grammar when I started learning French and German I had to do this in order to get to grips
with languages whose grammatical structures were different from (different to?)
my own. I still remember the exotic feeling of getting to grips with the subjunctive form in French and realising that form exists in English..
Books on my shelves now |
Proper
language is already there.
I well remember a child in my class saying to me ‘You mean I already talk in grammar, miss?’
Early
in my teaching career I
remember reading that by the age of five a normal child will have incorporated
all the rules of grammar of his own language into his brain structure They
don’t have to learn it, they speak it. It may be useful for them to learn the rules they already operate at some
point - for example when you learn a
foreign language.
Or perhaps it is useful when you become a writer and have to edit your own work…
I know from my workshops that some writers get jumpy and defensive about grammar and
syntax.. Either they’re hidebound by the memory of bad teaching or a clumsy editor. Or terrified of looking stupid. Or - however good a
storyteller they are - they are innocent
of grammatical conventions in written
language and that very innocence could send their work flying onto some editor’s floor.
This
is a pity -these
natural storytellers can make very good fiction writers. They have the
most important qualities a feeling for the trajectory of a story,
an ear for dialogue and a fresh world view.
Good,
self-developing writers reach out for help where they can. A 2009
page on my blog , which has Semi-Colon in the title is still very much
visited although it is also about my collection Knives and the writer RC
HUtchinson
Syntax as a Valuable Building Block
Syntax as a Valuable Building Block
The
first crucial building block for a writer is the ability to create a world, to build a
narrative, to have an extensive vocabulary (all that reading!) and a mind that
sees the world afresh –dreaming dreams and having visions.
The
second building block is to build on their innate
comfort with the magic of their own
language and become comfortable with the value in knowing syntax and grammar
when they starte editing their own work.
When my students begin to trust that I
won’t laugh at their innocence they will ask crucial questions and these
questions are the key to their further writing development,.
Just
what is a sentence?
What
is a paragraph?
What
is the difference
between dialogue told and dialogue said.
My
very best advice is to
read more, to look at how sentences, paragraphs and dialogue presents itself on
the pages of modern novels and short stories.
These works must be modern because
grammar is a dynamic force in prose; it changes through time. It evolves.
For
example page-long
paragraphs – acceptable in nineteenth century and early twentieth century
novels - will give a modern novel a
dated feel,
One evolution is the way some writers
(look at Roddy Doyle) have a very clean way to present dialogue which made the
purists tut-tut when they came out. But modern writers can make a choice.
The
rules on paragraphs can be ambiguous. I suggest that a paragraph is a whole idea, a piece of speech or
an aspect of the whole setting, building up the
climax of the narrative within the chapter or the short story. It promotes
the transparency of the narrative. It does not get between the reader and the
narrative.
Top
tip. When the idea, the
speaker, the setting changes changes, try a new paragraph.
Look
at the paragraphs on the page. White space promotes clarity; it allows
the reader to breathe his own way into your narrative.
When students are in doubt about technicalities, I recomment the plain, easy and
accessible Elements of Style by Strunk and White.- a volume written (I
heard) for American students coming to study at universities in England . There
you will learn what since childhood you have known instinctively.
Once
you end up knowing how the rules of syntax work then you can choose, if you
want, to break them. But that will then be a knowing process. And you can comfort yourself in knowing that there
are some individuals who know syntax up to their eyeballs but could never pen a
good story in a hundred years.
Syntax as a Stumbling Block
This happens when you – perhaps from
school or a clumsy and thoughtless editor – become frozen like a rabbit in
headlights at the embarrassment of being seen as stupid when you don’t quite
get the difference between verbal story telling and story telling on the page.
At one time editors would work with very
promising writers who were not quite there. But nowadays they are very busy,
exhausted with their corporate strategies and business models, so you have to
do it yourself,
So
don’t let it be a stumbling block. If you edit yourself with a clear knowledge of syntax the manuscript
you present will not have laughable flaws that could blind the readers to a
wonderful story.
This
process of ultimate self editing is even more crucial in these days of indie publishing and
eBooking. One of the biggest criticism of the flood of self published eBooks is
the variable standard of editing without the filter of a publisher’s editor to
catch the flaws.
In
any case, syntax is intricate, it is relatively easy and - dare I say it? - it is fun. Every
writer should be the master of his or her own language. Grammar stands there
alongside originality, vision, vocabulary, narrative skill as a crucial tool
for the successful writer, whatever their approach to publishing.
And more books.... |
Happy writing. W
No comments:
Post a Comment